Elements of Racketeering that Pertain to this Case

Racketeering refers to a number of criminal activities specified under state and federal law. A “pattern of racketeering activity,” means engaging in at least two of the specified racketeering activities within 10 years. This includes state and federal criminal acts. The Colorado criminal acts that are considered racketeering activities which pertain to this case include: 

Marco Chayet, Frank Danzo III, Stephen J. Young, Rodney Snow, Jerre Dixon and Dennis C. Parr willfully and intentionally engaged in an agreement as manifested by their concerted actions within 10 years and under the circumstances to defraud Larry Parr of $6,000,000.00, which was comprised of his commercial property, his home, his business and his rightful inheritance (for which he had paid Emma Parr a sum of $1,400,000). 

While Emma Parr was thwarted in amending her estate in 2005, she was successful in amending it in 2006, through an attorney she chose. Unfortunately, in the ensuing 9 years, by 2015, her intentions and decrees were never realized because of the concerted actions and by the felonious documents created by the co-conspirators which were repeatedly used and compounded in each trial between 2006 and 2015. 

Each co-conspirator performed an overt act to further this conspiracy

Frank Danzo, III and Stephen J. Young fraudulently deceived Larry Parr so that he would fall victim to incrimination based upon false evidence when presented in court.

Larry Parr implemented the leases in good faith based upon the representations of Marco Chayet Frank Danzo, III and Stephen J. Young and his trust for them as attorneys. As the leases were presented as evidence in court, between May, 2011 through April, 2015, Larry Parr was accused of fraud and committing heinous crimes against Emma Parr, the Partnership and its’ partners all stemming from the initial incriminating fraudulent leases fabricated by Frank Danzo, III and Stephen J. Young and the fraudulent suit against Larry Parr initiated in 2006, by Rodney Snow. 

In December, 2005, Rodney Snow, under the guise as Emma Parr’s attorney, threatened in writing that he would have Larry Parr arrested and have a restraining order placed against him if Larry had any contact with Emma or entered any portion of the E. Parr Family Limited Partnership property where Larry and Emma had a long standing and implemented agreement. The agreement was initiated in 1995, before the establishment of the partnership in 2000, and allowed Larry to conduct business on the 4.2 acres which was originally owned by Emma and, in 2000, transferred to the Partnership.

Rodney Snow induced Larry Parr to act against his will and refrain from entering the Partnership property to conduct business and from speaking to or having contact with Emma Parr, to whom Larry had fiduciary responsibilities.

 It can be clearly proved by evidence documented in the billings of The Office of Chayet, Young, Dawson, Meegan, And Danzo LLC and the emails from and between Michael Green to Rod Hester, Frank Danzo III and Stephen Young, that Dennis Parr attended at least nearly every meeting held by Frank Danzo III and Stephen Young in regard to the scope of work agreed to in the letter of engagement, and that he was also being represented by his C.P.A., and was therefore, knowledgeable and aware of every one and all events and concerns regarding the leases and the Partnerships. 

Dennis Parr had criminal intent which can be inferred by the fact that while testifying under oath six years later, on May 25, 2011, he denied any knowledge of the events, discussions and proceedings involved with the Partnership amendments and the lease agreements as part of the scope of work being performed by the firm The Office of Chayet, Young, Dawson, Meegan, and Danzo LLC. 

 Dennis Parr intimidated and victimized Emma Parr on the night of June 19, 2006, when he drove her to the lake across from her house to thwart her attempts to terminate Rodney Snow’s unwanted legal representation of her. She also wanted to end suit that was initiated by Rodney Snow and Dennis against Larry Parr that was filed in her name without her knowledge or consent.  (Hear Emma Parr as she describes this incident to her attorney, L. William Schmid; go to "Links" page, click on "Find out more" tab and listen to Audio 25, ) 

Dennis attempted to prevent or dissuade Emma from terminating Rodney Snow from acting as her attorney, with an intent to vex, annoy, emotionally harm or injure in any way Emma with an intent to thwart or interfere in the orderly administration of justice. His actions had long reaching consequences as her competency was questioned by Judge Post, who presided over Rodney Snow’s unlawful civil suite against Larry Parr.